alamb commented on issue #8156: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/8156#issuecomment-3197783787
> > I belive the issue is tracked in > > Yes, that issue grew out trying to implement [apache/parquet-format#221](https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/221). The thing I like most about that proposal vs `nan_counts` is that it makes a clean break from the underdefined past. If the new column order is detected, you can trust the statistics, if not, then you can't. To be clear, I think the most recent proposal has *BOTH* the new order as well as Nan counts -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
