scovich commented on code in PR #8189: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/8189#discussion_r2291047273
########## parquet-variant/src/builder.rs: ########## @@ -306,93 +296,80 @@ impl ValueBuilder { self.0.len() } - fn new_object<'a>( - &'a mut self, - metadata_builder: &'a mut MetadataBuilder, - ) -> ObjectBuilder<'a> { - let parent_state = ParentState::variant(self, metadata_builder); - let validate_unique_fields = false; - ObjectBuilder::new(parent_state, validate_unique_fields) - } - - fn new_list<'a>(&'a mut self, metadata_builder: &'a mut MetadataBuilder) -> ListBuilder<'a> { - let parent_state = ParentState::variant(self, metadata_builder); - let validate_unique_fields = false; - ListBuilder::new(parent_state, validate_unique_fields) - } - /// Appends a variant to the builder. /// /// # Panics /// /// This method will panic if the variant contains duplicate field names in objects /// when validation is enabled. For a fallible version, use [`ValueBuilder::try_append_variant`] - fn append_variant<'m, 'd>( - &mut self, - variant: Variant<'m, 'd>, - metadata_builder: &mut MetadataBuilder, - ) { + fn append_variant(mut state: ParentState<'_>, variant: Variant<'_, '_>) { + let builder = state.value_builder(); match variant { - Variant::Null => self.append_null(), - Variant::BooleanTrue => self.append_bool(true), - Variant::BooleanFalse => self.append_bool(false), - Variant::Int8(v) => self.append_int8(v), - Variant::Int16(v) => self.append_int16(v), - Variant::Int32(v) => self.append_int32(v), - Variant::Int64(v) => self.append_int64(v), - Variant::Date(v) => self.append_date(v), - Variant::TimestampMicros(v) => self.append_timestamp_micros(v), - Variant::TimestampNtzMicros(v) => self.append_timestamp_ntz_micros(v), - Variant::TimestampNanos(v) => self.append_timestamp_nanos(v), - Variant::TimestampNtzNanos(v) => self.append_timestamp_ntz_nanos(v), - Variant::Decimal4(decimal4) => self.append_decimal4(decimal4), - Variant::Decimal8(decimal8) => self.append_decimal8(decimal8), - Variant::Decimal16(decimal16) => self.append_decimal16(decimal16), - Variant::Float(v) => self.append_float(v), - Variant::Double(v) => self.append_double(v), - Variant::Binary(v) => self.append_binary(v), - Variant::String(s) => self.append_string(s), - Variant::ShortString(s) => self.append_short_string(s), - Variant::Uuid(v) => self.append_uuid(v), - Variant::Object(obj) => self.append_object(metadata_builder, obj), - Variant::List(list) => self.append_list(metadata_builder, list), - Variant::Time(v) => self.append_time_micros(v), + Variant::Null => builder.append_null(), + Variant::BooleanTrue => builder.append_bool(true), + Variant::BooleanFalse => builder.append_bool(false), + Variant::Int8(v) => builder.append_int8(v), + Variant::Int16(v) => builder.append_int16(v), + Variant::Int32(v) => builder.append_int32(v), + Variant::Int64(v) => builder.append_int64(v), + Variant::Date(v) => builder.append_date(v), + Variant::Time(v) => builder.append_time_micros(v), + Variant::TimestampMicros(v) => builder.append_timestamp_micros(v), + Variant::TimestampNtzMicros(v) => builder.append_timestamp_ntz_micros(v), + Variant::TimestampNanos(v) => builder.append_timestamp_nanos(v), + Variant::TimestampNtzNanos(v) => builder.append_timestamp_ntz_nanos(v), + Variant::Decimal4(decimal4) => builder.append_decimal4(decimal4), + Variant::Decimal8(decimal8) => builder.append_decimal8(decimal8), + Variant::Decimal16(decimal16) => builder.append_decimal16(decimal16), + Variant::Float(v) => builder.append_float(v), + Variant::Double(v) => builder.append_double(v), + Variant::Binary(v) => builder.append_binary(v), + Variant::String(s) => builder.append_string(s), + Variant::ShortString(s) => builder.append_short_string(s), + Variant::Uuid(v) => builder.append_uuid(v), + Variant::Object(obj) => return Self::append_object(state, obj), + Variant::List(list) => return Self::append_list(state, list), } + state.finish(); Review Comment: The nested builders have to take ownership of their parent state (else many call sites would illegally return a reference to a temporary). So here, we have an owned value that sometimes needs `finish` and sometimes doesn't. Returning `Option<ParentState<'_>>` seems ugly and annoying? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org