jecsand838 commented on code in PR #8220:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/8220#discussion_r2302208952
##########
arrow-avro/src/reader/record.rs:
##########
@@ -1471,4 +1753,196 @@ mod tests {
assert!(int_array.is_null(0)); // row1 is null
assert_eq!(int_array.value(1), 42); // row3 value is 42
}
+
+ fn make_record_resolved_decoder(
Review Comment:
@alamb I'm planning to include `Maker::resolve_type` method branches for
the complex and logical types over my next few PRs (for example the enum
mapping PR I put up has support for the `Enum` branch). These branches just
have additional logic and I didn't want to balloon this PR.
That being said I probably should have included placeholders and then in
turn tests able to reach the `Skipper::from_avro` method as a part of this PR.
That's definitely my mistake.
So I went ahead and added those placeholder branches and created an Avro
file that covers every type currently supported by `arrow-avro` using this
python script:
https://gist.github.com/jecsand838/82d9874a5f9be8a636dcd49ad9b8e237
Then I added a new `test_skippable_types_project_each_field_individually`
test to the `arrow-avro/src/reader/mod.rs` file. This test behaves as you
recommended in your other comment. Once the `arrow-avro` `Writer` has full type
support, we can move towards a round trip approach as well. However the changes
I just pushed up should include coverages for each skipping each of those types
now.
Thank you for catching this and calling it out!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
