felipecrv commented on issue #3449:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/issues/3449#issuecomment-3300643870

   > Sounds reasonable. Maybe `ADBC:typename` for the key?
   
   Can we namespace it by the database name since the type is only fully 
understandable in the context of its dialect?
   
   `SNOWFLAKE:type`, `BIGQUERY:type`, `DATABRICKS:type`... this makes it clear 
that the interpretation of the SQL string can only be done reliably considering 
the specific dialect.
   
   The Arrow types in the schema are dialect agnostic and generic tooling can 
be developed in terms of it, but for the full resolution, one needs to look at 
the dialect-specific metadata.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to