westonpace commented on pull request #10070:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10070#issuecomment-821393195


   It's a pity, if we were not crossing languages I think we could require as 
input an iterable (something that can be invoked to generate a (potentially 
one-shot) iterator) instead of an iterator and then wouldn't have to have this 
distinction.  This looks good but do we want to open a second JIRA for the 
post-12289 follow-up or just wait and do that work in this JIRA later?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to