klion26 opened a new issue, #8672: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/8672
We may need a follow-up item to track turning this into a proper Result instead of silently converting to NULL on failure? That would require `VariantArray::value` to return a `Result<Variant>`, which is a biggish change but honestly seems appropriate given that we can't guarantee the input shredding is even physically valid, let alone logically valid? It seems too sharp an edge to just panic. @alamb -- thoughts? _Originally posted by @scovich in https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/8638#discussion_r2445573930_ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
