joeramirez commented on issue #48057: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/48057#issuecomment-3492639276
Hi @thisisnic . Thanks for taking the time! I actually made a small reprex where I create a simulated dataframe similar to mine and then test reading from it with arrow and nanoparquet separately. Please see the attached R script for that. Using that, I created the profviz profiles for the arrow and nano runs, which are also attached. Lastly, there actually is a small difference in the objects from each run. The arrow result looks to be a tibble I believe (class `"tbl_df" "tbl" "data.frame"`) while the nanoparquet result looks to be a dataframe (class `"tbl" "data.frame"`). However, the data inside them matches. [arrow_vs_nano.zip](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/23372192/arrow_vs_nano.zip) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
