palday commented on code in PR #582:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-julia/pull/582#discussion_r2665726882


##########
src/arraytypes/dictencoding.jl:
##########
@@ -142,55 +142,58 @@ function arrowvector(
     kw...,
 )
     id = x.encoding.id
+    # XXX This is a race condition if two workers hit this block at the same 
time, then they'll create
+    # distinct locks
     if !haskey(de, id)
         de[id] = Lockable(x.encoding)
-    else
-        encodinglockable = de[id]
-        Base.@lock encodinglockable begin
-            encoding = encodinglockable.value
-            # in this case, we just need to check if any values in our local 
pool need to be delta dicationary serialized
-            deltas = setdiff(x.encoding, encoding)
-            if !isempty(deltas)
-                ET = indextype(encoding)
-                if length(deltas) + length(encoding) > typemax(ET)
-                    error(
-                        "fatal error serializing dict encoded column with ref 
index type of $ET; subsequent record batch unique values resulted in 
$(length(deltas) + length(encoding)) unique values, which exceeds possible 
index values in $ET",
-                    )
-                end
-                data = arrowvector(
-                    deltas,
-                    i,
-                    nl,
-                    fi,
-                    de,
-                    ded,
-                    nothing;
-                    dictencode=dictencodenested,
-                    dictencodenested=dictencodenested,
-                    dictencoding=true,
-                    kw...,
+        return x

Review Comment:
   changed this to an early return to make the overall logic a little clearer / 
reduce nesting of the `else` branch.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to