jorisvandenbossche commented on PR #49210: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/49210#issuecomment-3886023319
> `datetime64[s]` makes more sense to me compared to `datetime64[ms]` because of second resolution's capacity to represent a larger amount of dates that a `date32/64` might represent. For `date32[day]` that indeed makes sense, but for `date64[ms]`, using `datetime64[ms]` ensures that the conversion is more likely to be zero-copy (and I think that that point we maybe took date32 to use ms as well for consistency, since a conversion for that type is needed anyhow) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
