alamb commented on issue #234: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/234#issuecomment-830870672
I honestly don't have a strong opinion and can with whatever versioning scheme. If I am left to my own devices, I would likely keep on the current versioning scheme On Sun, May 2, 2021 at 2:13 PM Jorge Leitao ***@***.***> wrote: > IMO it is more important to have a version that correctly represents the > state of the software than datafusion in cargo. > > IMO 0.X is the correct state of the software, both from a security point > of view and if we plan to integrate Ballista more closely with DataFusion. > > I find it odd that the vast majority of the software in Rust is pre-1, but > arrow, parquet, DataFusion, etc, is post-1 (and all of them with an API > that is essentially unstable). IMO that is an historical artifact, and we > rather correct it sooner than later. > > The perception of 3.0 in Rust is that the software had a significant > maturation time. > > From a users' perspective, the switch is a very low effort and I do think > that we have the necessary channels to market any change (mailing, slack, > github, cargo.io, etc). > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/234#issuecomment-830849093>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADXZMLGPGJKCHQXCTOGKUDTLWI23ANCNFSM436N3ARA> > . > -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
