Reranko05 commented on PR #49660: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/49660#issuecomment-4188297441
> Could you use `arrow::Result<std::string>` return type instead of using `ARROW_LOG()`? Thanks for the suggestion @kou ! Just to clarify, would you prefer changing the existing base64_decode API to return arrow::Result<std::string>, or introducing a separate checked variant while keeping the current API unchanged? I want to make sure the approach aligns with existing usage and expectations. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
