tokoko commented on PR #49796: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/49796#issuecomment-4637516668
@CurtHagenlocher I do get the sentiment, but I still think it's worth giving a shot. ADBC is still fresh enough that we should be able to cover most of the basic functionality in most drivers to create some value. We also might be able to create some sort of an ecosystem pressure I'm hoping. if spark, pbi, duckdb UX improves by providing enough of the sql metadata, there should be an incentive. The way I'm looking at it, the only alternatives are: - substrait which would be ideal, but even bigger ask at this point for both applications to produce and drivers to consume. if the use case is entire query generation, I think substrait is probably the only way to go, but I think it's impractical to make even "simpler" pushdown sql generation dependent on substrait support. - every adbc consumer maintaining their own dialect definitions, essentially the same as flags approach that's not owned by drivers. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
