Copilot commented on code in PR #840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/pull/840#discussion_r3368772850


##########
parquet/variant/valuesize_test.go:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+// Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+// or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+// distributed with this work for additional information
+// regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+// to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+// "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+// with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+//
+// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+//
+// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+// limitations under the License.
+
+package variant
+
+import (
+       "testing"
+
+       "github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
+       "github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
+)
+
+func TestValueSizeLargeArray(t *testing.T) {
+       // Build a large array with >255 elements to trigger is_large=true.
+       // This is a regression test for the is_large bit position in 
valueSize().
+       var b Builder
+       start := b.Offset()
+       offsets := make([]int, 0, 300)
+       for i := 0; i < 300; i++ {
+               offsets = append(offsets, b.NextElement(start))
+               b.AppendNull()
+       }
+       require.NoError(t, b.FinishArray(start, offsets))
+
+       raw := b.BuildWithoutMeta()
+
+       // Verify the header has is_large set at the correct bit position
+       typeInfo := (raw[0] >> basicTypeBits) & typeInfoMask
+       isLarge := ((typeInfo >> 2) & 0x1) == 1
+       assert.True(t, isLarge, "expected is_large=true for 300-element array")
+
+       // Verify valueSize returns correct result
+       got := valueSize(raw)
+
+       // Compute expected size:
+       // header(1) + numElements(4, is_large=true) + 
offsets((300+1)*offsetSize) + data(300*1)
+       offsetSize := int((typeInfo & 0b11) + 1)
+       expected := 1 + 4 + (300+1)*offsetSize + 300
+
+       assert.Equal(t, expected, got, "valueSize should correctly handle large 
arrays")
+}
+
+func TestValueSizeLargeObject(t *testing.T) {
+       // Verify that valueSize still works correctly for large objects (>255 
fields).
+       var b Builder
+       start := b.Offset()
+       fields := make([]FieldEntry, 0, 300)
+       for i := 0; i < 300; i++ {
+               fields = append(fields, b.NextField(start, 
string(rune('a'+i%26))+string(rune('0'+i/26))))
+               b.AppendNull()
+       }
+       require.NoError(t, b.FinishObject(start, fields))
+
+       raw := b.BuildWithoutMeta()
+       got := valueSize(raw)
+
+       // Object should have a valid non-zero size
+       assert.Greater(t, got, 0, "valueSize should return positive size for 
object")
+       assert.LessOrEqual(t, got, len(raw), "valueSize should not exceed 
buffer length")

Review Comment:
   `TestValueSizeLargeObject` is intended as a regression test, but the 
assertions are too weak: `valueSize` returning an incorrect (but positive) size 
would still pass as long as it’s <= len(raw). Since this builder only emits a 
single top-level object, the expected size is exactly `len(raw)`, and you can 
also explicitly verify the object `is_large` flag remains at bit 4.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to