conbench-apache-arrow[bot] commented on PR #50185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/50185#issuecomment-4726786246

   After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 4 benchmarking runs that have 
been run so far on merge-commit 39770ded560377c7d4ee4342faeec2029908958a.
   
   There were 6 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:
   
   - Commit Run on `test-mac-arm` at [2026-06-17 
05:36:21Z](https://conbench.arrow-dev.org/compare/runs/da1ed31e10ca493185366cf022eff3da...aaebbd6eaf204f3d94e6511341321c83/)
     - [`tpch` (R) with engine=arrow, format=native, language=R, 
memory_map=False, query_id=TPCH-12, 
scale_factor=1](https://conbench.arrow-dev.org/compare/benchmarks/06a321d37f63779580005f3b869d48fd...06a323d4e8217576800071925268c63b)
   
   - Commit Run on `amd64-m5-4xlarge-linux` at [2026-06-17 
01:49:54Z](https://conbench.arrow-dev.org/compare/runs/585779bc6fb34a88b31a3f177b200706...8fcc613f53a04e3d95d5ea79ad121e13/)
     - [`dataset-serialize` (Python) with dataset=nyctaxi_multi_parquet_s3, 
format=csv, 
selectivity=1pc](https://conbench.arrow-dev.org/compare/benchmarks/06a31de25ce671ea80001d302d8d48a1...06a3201d2e5e71958000e93f195b9d3e)
   - and 4 more (see the report linked below)
   
   The [full Conbench report](https://github.com/apache/arrow/runs/81834190425) 
has more details. It also includes information about 6 possible false positives 
for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to