fenfeng9 commented on issue #50142: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/50142#issuecomment-4779219408
> Second, I think there is still a real issue with `version='1.0'` / `version='2.4'`. `NANOS` is treated as a Parquet 2.6 feature, so writing `time64[ns]` as `TIME(NANOS)` when an older version is requested looks wrong to me. @pitrou Thanks for your reply! Do we still need to handle this case? If so, do you have any suggestions? For example, we could reuse `coerce_timestamps`/`allow_truncated_timestamps` for time types, or introduce new counterparts like `coerce_times` and `allow_truncated_times`? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
