zeroshade commented on PR #877: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-go/pull/877#issuecomment-4857843687
Rather than reject this, we should properly support it instead. There's no reason why we shouldn't allow constructing a dense union where the offsets and typeIDs are using different offsets. Rather than rejecting this, can we instead fix the physical offset handling to handle this scenario? For reference, neither C++ nor rust reject this, but both exhibit this same bug. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
