alamb opened a new issue, #10501: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/10501
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge? We plan to remove explicit integration with `object_store` from the `parquet` crate, see - https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10354 The core rationale is to 1. Ease downstream dependency management 2. The amount of code is relatively small, so it is easy to incorporate into downstream crates and customize as needed However it might be nicer (we think) if there was an easier way to get a pre-tested integration in a crate ### Describe the solution you'd like The idea would be to add `ParquetObjectReader` and `ParquetObjectWriter` (that implement the object_store APIs for parquet reading / writing respectively) we could potentially moving the integration to a new crate (e.g. parquet-object-store) and move the integration there. However, given the amount of code it would have (10s of lines of integration), a new crate seemed unecessary. However, if others feel strongly I would support that. We would still hvae to deprecate the export in this crate before removing them, so I think this PR would still be necessary ### Describe alternatives you've considered _No response_ ### Additional context _No response_ -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
