Alb3e3 commented on PR #51027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/51027#issuecomment-5496854400

   Thanks, both addressed in 3abb59ae80.
   
   - `bridge.cc`: replaced the manual extension-storage unwrap with 
`data->type->storage_id()`, and switched the two `physical_type->id()` checks 
to the resulting `physical_type_id`.
   - Added `ExampleDenseUnionExtension` / `ExampleSparseUnionExtension` to 
`arrow/testing` (declared in `extension_type.h`, defined in `gtest_util.cc` 
beside `ExampleUuid` et al.), and the export test now calls those instead of 
the inline lambdas.
   
   On the two cross-implementation notes: agreed that arrow-go and nanoarrow 
will need the same wrapping guard in their integration consumers for the 
extension-wrapped union to be exercised there, and that a registration gap 
could otherwise hide a bug. That is outside this C++/Python change; I have left 
it for @paleolimbot / @zeroshade as you flagged rather than pull it into this 
PR.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to