Rich-T-kid opened a new pull request, #10945:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/10945

   
   #10944
   
   # Which issue does this PR close?
   
   <!--
   We generally require a GitHub issue to be filed for all bug fixes and 
enhancements and this helps us generate change logs for our releases. You can 
link an issue to this PR using the GitHub syntax.
   -->
   
   - Closes #8879.
   
   # Rationale for this change
   
   `take_record_batch` previously called take per column, which always runs a 
bounds check on every index even when the caller already knows the indices are 
valid. For workloads doing repeated record batch takes with pre-validated 
indices — such as sort, merge, or filter pipelines — this check is redundant 
and measurable overhead. Benchmarks show ~13% speedup on primitive-column 
batches at 1024 rows when the check is skipped.
   <img width="643" height="161" alt="Image 9-1-26 at 2 28 PM" 
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5170db51-ff1c-4062-b4fe-c69de894ddbc";
 />
   
   
   <!--
   Why are you proposing this change? If this is already explained clearly in 
the issue then this section is not needed.
   Explaining clearly why changes are proposed helps reviewers understand your 
changes and offer better suggestions for fixes.
   -->
   
   # What changes are included in this PR?
   - Introduces pub unsafe fn take_record_batch_unchecked which bypasses index 
bounds checking by dispatching through `take_impl::<_, false>` directly
   <!--
   There is no need to duplicate the description in the issue here but it is 
sometimes worth providing a summary of the individual changes in this PR.
   -->
   
   # Are these changes tested?
   yes, existing test + miri
   <!--
   We typically require tests for all PRs in order to:
   1. Prevent the code from being accidentally broken by subsequent changes
   2. Serve as another way to document the expected behavior of the code
   
   If tests are not included in your PR, please explain why (for example, are 
they covered by existing tests)?
   
   If this PR claims a performance improvement, please include evidence such as 
benchmark results.
   -->
   
   # Are there any user-facing changes?
   new `take_record_batch_unchecked()` method.
   <!--
   If there are user-facing changes then we may require documentation to be 
updated before approving the PR.
   
   If there are any breaking changes to public APIs, please call them out.
   -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to