amitvijapur opened a new pull request, #11151: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/11151
# Which issue does this PR close? Closes #11098. # Rationale for this change `arrow-array/src/delta.rs` is copied from the chronoutil crate under MIT. NOTICE.txt credits it and `arrow-array/LICENSE-MIT` carries the license text, but the root LICENSE.txt is the bare Apache 2.0 text and neither names the component nor points to that file, which Xuanwo raised on the 60.0.0 vote thread and #10525 lists as required for 60.1.0. # What changes are included in this PR? A short section appended to LICENSE.txt: the file path and license, the component it derives from, and a pointer to `arrow-array/LICENSE-MIT`, which holds the copyright line and the full text. The copyright and URL are not repeated here because NOTICE.txt already carries them. The separator and `path: LICENSE` heading follow apache/arrow's LICENSE.txt; that file inlines each third-party license in full, whereas this points to the existing file, which is the form Xuanwo suggested. Happy to inline the 21 lines instead if that is preferred. delta.rs is the only source file in the tree with a non-Apache header (`git grep -l -E '^// (MIT License|Copyright \(c\))' -- '*.rs'`), so this is the whole coverage gap. # Are these changes tested? Text only. No script in `dev/` or `.github/` parses LICENSE.txt; the three `Cargo.toml` files that list it only package it. # Are there any user-facing changes? No. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
