thisisnic commented on code in PR #55260: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/55260#discussion_r4381036184
########## docs/source/developers/overview.rst: ########## @@ -191,6 +191,22 @@ submitted contributions. See the `ASF's guidance on AI-generated code <https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html>`_ for further information on licensing considerations. +We expect human contributors to actively engage on the review process. We +recognise the value of using AI tools to understand the changes being requested +but we expect a human-in-the-loop for all engagements. Reviewer time is limited +and reviewers are not expected to be talking to contributors' agents but to +contributors themselves. If a reviewer finds that a contributor seems to rely +excessively on AI tools instead of engaging with the review, the PR might be +closed and/or tagged with a label indicating excessive AI usage. Review Comment: FWIW I'm opposed to that as well as it's labelling the individual not the action. It's going to feel very personal to anyone who gets a false positive. We could achieve the same thing by just closing those PRs with an explanatory message, if we wanted to limit PRs from people who have made lots of PRs to lots of repos. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
