reidkaufmann commented on issue #888: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs-object-store/issues/888#issuecomment-6750654164
> Fundamentally I don't think we should be trying to implement a durable tranaction [sic] layer over the LocalFileSystem that handles all failure scenarios by sprinkling fsync around the codebase. I tend to think the value of the local filesystem support is compatibility, not performance. If you want performance, don't enable the fsync option. Supporting the atomicity guarantees of the other object stores IS quite valuable from the application developer's point of view (even if it isn't the most performant). The value: being able to abstract the application to the object store interface. > maintainers will be dealing with a string of bugs forever Feel free to close this. Often what is valuable is difficult, but if contributors aren't fixing bugs and maintainers are burdened, I understand. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
