Reranko05 commented on PR #55352: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/55352#issuecomment-6767722198
@rok Thanks for the heads-up! I was actually doubting whether this implementation was still relevant after @raulcd mentioned that > The biggest thing we lose is the auto-assign of issues. We could have a check to validate the issue is assigned but as users can't assign the issue themselves (unless they have triage) and we removed the ability to use take this would just give us more maintenance to maintainers. We could at merge time (on the merge script) assign the issue to the PR author and if it fails (user never commented on issue) we can just ignore the assignation as the important bit is the Author of the PR and this is what we count as contribution credit. I initially thought that would make this workflow unnecessary. However, I noticed that contributors working on some `good-first-issues` specifically ask to be assigned before starting work (I guess their LLMs tell them to do so 😄). So I think this workflow is still relevant after all! :) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
