rok commented on pull request #10176: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10176#issuecomment-854557201
> There seems to be something wrong with the ISO calendar (year) implementation. Will take a look. Still need to add test cases too. > Also in general, for non-nanosecond resolutions, you get wrong results for all kernels. It seems that it is interpreting the non-nanosecond epoch as nanosecond epoch. That's related to your previous comment that tests for other units are still failing? Yeah. It seems that currently all timestamps are interpreted as if having nanosecond unit. I suspect it's a kernel matching problem. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
