alamb commented on issue #770: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/770#issuecomment-885914512
Unless I hear differently I will plan to use the same strategy in arrow-datafusion Note it isn't clear to me when we will have a 5.0.0 release -- I have started a conversation here: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/771 On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 4:44 PM Nic ***@***.***> wrote: > @thisisnic <https://github.com/thisisnic> -- I am not sure what our > release plan for this would be. > > Would it work to use the same strategy here as arrow-rs -- namely tags > with the version numbers (4.0.0 and 5.0.0, etc)? Note that we don't > actually have those tags in the datafusion repo yet > > @alamb <https://github.com/alamb> That would definitely be the simplest > strategy for me, in terms of integrating with the current script I'm using, > but if you'd prefer a different approach, I am happy to adapt to that. > > — > You are receiving this because you were mentioned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/770#issuecomment-885904282>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADXZMM2HRWKQOCN57CHUADTZHICJANCNFSM5A4K24QA> > . > -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
