jonkeane commented on a change in pull request #10724:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10724#discussion_r682697874
##########
File path: r/R/dplyr-functions.R
##########
@@ -634,20 +634,53 @@ nse_funcs$wday <- function(x, label = FALSE, abbr = TRUE,
week_start = getOption
}
nse_funcs$log <- function(x, base = exp(1)) {
-
+
if (base == exp(1)) {
return(Expression$create("ln_checked", x))
}
-
+
if (base == 2) {
return(Expression$create("log2_checked", x))
}
-
+
if (base == 10) {
return(Expression$create("log10_checked", x))
- }
+ }
# ARROW-13345
stop("`base` values other than exp(1), 2 and 10 not supported in Arrow",
call. = FALSE)
}
nse_funcs$logb <- nse_funcs$log
+
+nse_funcs$if_else <- function(condition, true, false, missing = NULL){
+ # We ought to assert that the types of the true and false conditions will
result
+ # in the same types. We can't compare the objects themselves directly because
+ # they might be expressions (that will result in a type) or R objects that
will
+ # need to be compared to see if they are compatible with arrow types.
+ # ARROW-13186 might make this easier with a more robust way.
+ # TODO: do this ^^^
+
+ # if_else only supports boolean, numeric, or temporal types right now
+ # TODO: remove when ARROW-12955 merges
+ # If true/false are R types, we can use `is.*` directly
+ invalid_r_types <- is.character(true) || is.character(false) ||
is.list(true) ||
+ is.list(false) || is.factor(true) || is.factor(false)
+ # However, if they are expressions, we need to use the functions from
nse_funcs
+ invalid_expression_types_true <- inherits(true, "Expression") && (
+ nse_funcs$is.character(true) || nse_funcs$is.list(true) ||
nse_funcs$is.factor(true)
+ )
+ invalid_expression_types_false <- inherits(false, "Expression") && (
+ nse_funcs$is.character(false) || nse_funcs$is.list(false) ||
nse_funcs$is.factor(false)
+ )
+ if (invalid_r_types | invalid_expression_types_true |
invalid_expression_types_false) {
+ stop("`true` and `false` character values not yet supported in Arrow",
call. = FALSE)
+ }
Review comment:
That sounds great. Cause the null-encode is basically the only other
safe option and is also pretty common to want
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
