wesm commented on pull request #10934:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10934#issuecomment-919626099


   Per my comments on the mailing list, if this helps unblock our 
experimentation with a serialized-query-plan-type interface in C++, and it is 
abundantly clear that it is experimental (it might be a good idea to steer 
clear of the format/ directory altogether, somewhere else perhaps?) and aiding 
with dependent developments, then merging this seems okay with me. 
   
   Hopefully we can work toward convergence with what is being discussed in 
Substrait (though having to use protobufs fills me with dread — we could use 
https://github.com/nanopb/nanopb to avoid taking on a libprotobuf dependency 
that we don't want in libarrow), but if not we can cross that bridge when we 
get there. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@arrow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


Reply via email to