pitrou commented on a change in pull request #11076:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/11076#discussion_r713177642



##########
File path: cpp/src/arrow/python/inference.cc
##########
@@ -354,12 +365,15 @@ class TypeInferrer {
       *keep_going = make_unions_;
     } else if (PyArray_CheckAnyScalarExact(obj)) {
       RETURN_NOT_OK(VisitDType(PyArray_DescrFromScalar(obj), keep_going));
-    } else if (PyList_Check(obj)) {
-      RETURN_NOT_OK(VisitList(obj, keep_going));
+    } else if (PySet_Check(obj) || (Py_TYPE(obj) == &PyDictValues_Type)) {
+      RETURN_NOT_OK(VisitSet(obj, keep_going));
     } else if (PyArray_Check(obj)) {
       RETURN_NOT_OK(VisitNdarray(obj, keep_going));
     } else if (PyDict_Check(obj)) {
       RETURN_NOT_OK(VisitDict(obj));
+    } else if (PyList_Check(obj) || PyTuple_Check(obj) ||
+               PyObject_IsInstance(obj, deque_type_.obj())) {

Review comment:
       I still don't understand why we want to accept deques here. I don't 
think it is usual to store analytical data in deques. @jorisvandenbossche What 
do you think?




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to