aucahuasi commented on a change in pull request #11257:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/11257#discussion_r721489861



##########
File path: cpp/src/arrow/compute/kernels/aggregate_test.cc
##########
@@ -873,6 +874,98 @@ TYPED_TEST(TestRandomNumericCountKernel, RandomArrayCount) 
{
   }
 }
 
+//
+// Count Distinct
+//
+
+class TestCountDistinctKernel : public ::testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  void SetUp() override {
+    only_valid = CountOptions(CountOptions::ONLY_VALID);
+    only_null = CountOptions(CountOptions::ONLY_NULL);
+    all = CountOptions(CountOptions::ALL);
+  }
+
+  Datum Expected(int64_t value) { return 
MakeScalar(static_cast<int64_t>(value)); }
+
+  void Check(Datum input, int64_t expected_all, bool has_nulls = true) {
+    int64_t expected_valid = has_nulls ? expected_all - 1 : expected_all;
+    int64_t expected_null = has_nulls ? 1 : 0;
+    CheckScalar("count_distinct", {input}, Expected(expected_valid), 
&only_valid);
+    CheckScalar("count_distinct", {input}, Expected(expected_null), 
&only_null);
+    CheckScalar("count_distinct", {input}, Expected(expected_all), &all);
+  }
+
+  void Check(const std::shared_ptr<DataType>& type, util::string_view json,
+             int64_t expected_all, bool has_nulls = true) {
+    Check(ArrayFromJSON(type, json), expected_all, has_nulls);
+  }
+
+  CountOptions only_valid;
+  CountOptions only_null;
+  CountOptions all;
+};
+
+TEST_F(TestCountDistinctKernel, AllArrowTypesWithNulls) {

Review comment:
       I see thanks. So if I understand correctly: I need to put a test for 
counting distinct values of a scalar value (with nulls). So if I use a single 
non null (non nested) scalar, the output would be 1, but if the scalar is null, 
the output would be still 1 right? Please provide more examples if you can.




-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to