paddyhoran commented on issue #814: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/814#issuecomment-952177881
Sorry for taking so long. I modeled the original impl on the C++ implementation, it's possible that the C++ impl added this after I wrote the initial implementation. I agree with the change. > It may be the case that we simply "wait for arrow2" and not do this ticket I've been out of the loop, is there a plan for adopting `arrow2`? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
