tustvold commented on a change in pull request #1228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/pull/1228#discussion_r797007256
##########
File path: arrow/src/util/bit_chunk_iterator.rs
##########
@@ -272,4 +462,149 @@ mod tests {
assert_eq!(u64::MAX, bitchunks.iter().last().unwrap());
assert_eq!(0x7F, bitchunks.remainder_bits());
}
+
+ #[test]
+ #[allow(clippy::assertions_on_constants)]
+ fn test_unaligned_bit_chunk_iterator() {
+ // This test exploits the fact Buffer is at least 64-byte aligned
+ assert!(ALIGNMENT > 64);
+
+ let buffer = Buffer::from(&[0xFF; 5]);
+ let unaligned = UnalignedBitChunk::new(buffer.as_slice(), 0, 40);
+
+ assert_eq!(unaligned.prefix(), Some((1 << 40) - 1));
+ assert_eq!(unaligned.suffix(), None);
+ assert!(unaligned.chunks().is_empty());
+ assert_eq!(unaligned.lead_padding(), 0);
+ assert_eq!(unaligned.trailing_padding(), 24);
+
+ let buffer = buffer.slice(1);
+ let unaligned = UnalignedBitChunk::new(buffer.as_slice(), 0, 32);
+
+ assert_eq!(unaligned.prefix(), Some((1 << 32) - 1));
+ assert_eq!(unaligned.suffix(), None);
+ assert!(unaligned.chunks().is_empty());
+ assert_eq!(unaligned.lead_padding(), 0);
+ assert_eq!(unaligned.trailing_padding(), 32);
+
+ let unaligned = UnalignedBitChunk::new(buffer.as_slice(), 5, 27);
+
+ assert_eq!(unaligned.prefix(), Some(((1 << 32) - 1) - ((1 << 5) - 1)));
Review comment:
So I ran into challenges making a reversible `UnalignedBitChunkIterator`
which is necessary for `iter_set_bits_rev`, which actually led me to a simpler
solution - just implement `iter_set_bits_rev` in terms of `UnalignedBitChunk`
and make the iterator crate private. Let me know what you think of this
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
