alamb commented on issue #1832: URL: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/1832#issuecomment-1039195572
I think this sounds like a good idea to me as it will allow other projects to serialize DataFusion structures if they desire. Thank you @carols10cents for opening the issue I believe @thinkharderdev is also working on some changes related to serialization so perhaps they have some thoughts too. One way to split up these crates might be to keep the datafusion and ballista bits separate: ``` # Datafusion specific serialization (like Expr, LogicalPlan) # depends on datafusion datafusion-serialization # Ballista specific serialization (not sure exactly what this entails) # depends on datafusion-serialization and ballista ballista/rust/core ``` cc @yahoNanJing @Ted-Jiang @realno @Jimexist @andygrove -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
