TheNeuralBit commented on a change in pull request #11529:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/11529#discussion_r427580795
##########
File path:
sdks/java/io/google-cloud-platform/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/io/gcp/spanner/SpannerIOWriteTest.java
##########
@@ -263,6 +263,17 @@ private void verifyBatches(Iterable<Mutation>... batches) {
@Test
public void noBatching() throws Exception {
+
+ // This test uses a different mock/fake because it explicitly does not
want to populate the
+ // Spanner schema.
+ FakeServiceFactory fakeServiceFactory = new FakeServiceFactory();
+ ReadOnlyTransaction tx = mock(ReadOnlyTransaction.class);
+
when(fakeServiceFactory.mockDatabaseClient().readOnlyTransaction()).thenReturn(tx);
+
+ // Capture batches sent to writeAtLeastOnce.
+
when(fakeServiceFactory.mockDatabaseClient().writeAtLeastOnce(mutationBatchesCaptor.capture()))
+ .thenReturn(null);
+
Review comment:
Actually on second thought I wonder if we should just leave this test
completely unchanged (i.e. call `verifyBatches`, don't check that the DB schema
is never read). The fact the schema isn't read seems like an implementation
detail that we don't need to explicitly verify. What do you think?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
