MarcoRob commented on PR #17473:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/17473#issuecomment-1179273383

   Status update: looks the issue regarding this flaky test is due the `seek 
function` from Pulsar Client, when it was seeking the timestamp, sometimes it 
sought a previous timestamp that was already processed then the error that the 
timestamp was not in the new range
   Solution approach: set a validation when the start timestamp or initial 
restriction is greater than the current timestamp, then re-run the process 
until it grabs the correct timestamp.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to