reuvenlax commented on issue #21368: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/21368#issuecomment-1227696403
We do cache the client instances. The problem is that today, each destination table requires a separate client. On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 8:45 AM Lukasz Cwik ***@***.***> wrote: > Yes the scheduled executor service should be shared but it is the wrong > scope of object to be shared. Based upon GCP client library best practices > the recommendation is to share the client instance itself across multiple > usages > <https://cloud.google.com/apis/docs/client-libraries-best-practices#reuse_client_objects_and_sessions> > . > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/21368#issuecomment-1227451738>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFAYJVO3W6RHULH7JCN4ZGLV26IKRANCNFSM5X4DNNQQ> > . > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: > ***@***.***> > -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
