Abacn commented on issue #24021:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/24021#issuecomment-1309427424

   > > On the other hand @Amar3tto could you please check the rabbitmq instance 
leaking issue?
   > 
   > Yes, I will take a look.
   
   Found the latest performance run 
https://ci-beam.apache.org/view/PerformanceTests/job/beam_PerformanceTests_SparkReceiver_IO/39/
 does not leave persistent rabbitmq workloads on k8s cluster. The leak is 
either probabilistic or due to execution outside the jenkins (those workloads 
had default namespace "rabbit-test" and "default" instead of named after task 
ID).
   
   The issue is mitigated for now. Thanks for your attention.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to