robertwb commented on PR #25914: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/25914#issuecomment-1481724304
Ah. I hope not; the various implementations (or at least their public APIs) should be drop in replacements for each other. It's possible local runner performance may suffer, but probably not by that much, and it was never targeted at high efficiency anyway. On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 10:53 AM tvalentyn ***@***.***> wrote: > yes, I understand this code is not relevant for job submission. My > question is whether we should anticipate issues for some users of Mac OS > b/c they will be using a different protobuf implementation. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/25914#issuecomment-1481636836>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AADWVAM7UBASMZNWPRC5MA3W5SEYBANCNFSM6AAAAAAWCUPNJA> > . > You are receiving this because you modified the open/close state.Message > ID: ***@***.***> > -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
