bvolpato commented on code in PR #29001:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/29001#discussion_r1360952389
##########
sdks/python/container/Dockerfile:
##########
@@ -17,18 +17,15 @@
###############################################################################
ARG py_version
-FROM python:"${py_version}"-bullseye as beam
-LABEL Author "Apache Beam <[email protected]>"
-ARG TARGETOS
-ARG TARGETARCH
-COPY target/base_image_requirements.txt /tmp/base_image_requirements.txt
-COPY target/apache-beam.tar.gz /opt/apache/beam/tars/
-COPY target/launcher/${TARGETOS}_${TARGETARCH}/boot target/LICENSE
target/NOTICE target/LICENSE.python /opt/apache/beam/
+FROM python:"${py_version}"-bookworm as python-base
Review Comment:
Thanks!
Just curious - any particular reason to use Bookworm instead of Bullseye?
It's a new version, but it becomes a bit of nonstandard. My guess is that we
could bump up the baseline to Bookworm separately
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
