github-actions[bot] opened a new issue, #35290:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/35290

   
     Performance change found in the
     test: `gbk_python_batch_load_test_2gb_of_10B_records` for the metric: 
`runtime`.
   
     For more information on how to triage the alerts, please look at
     `Triage performance alert issues` section of the 
[README](https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/master/sdks/python/apache_beam/testing/analyzers/README.md#triage-performance-alert-issues).
   
   
   `Test description:` GroupByKey Python Load test - 2GB of 10B records
   python | GBK | Small records (10B)
   Test Dashboard - 
http://metrics.beam.apache.org/d/UYZ-oJ3Zk/gbk-load-tests?orgId=1&var-processingType=batch&var-sdk=python&from=now-90d&to=now&viewPanel=2
   Test link - 
https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/5e38decf9e723a385057131b01bbd33d8c60bda3/.test-infra/jenkins/job_LoadTests_GBK_Python.groovy#L36C25-L36C72
   
   
   ```
   
   timestamp: Sat Jun 14 16:18:42 2025, metric_value: 643.00
   timestamp: Fri Jun 13 16:28:57 2025, metric_value: 988.00
   timestamp: Thu Jun 12 16:23:05 2025, metric_value: 624.00 <---- Anomaly
   timestamp: Wed Jun 11 16:28:16 2025, metric_value: 907.00
   timestamp: Tue Jun 10 16:30:47 2025, metric_value: 988.00
   timestamp: Mon Jun  9 16:33:24 2025, metric_value: 867.00
   timestamp: Sun Jun  8 16:20:17 2025, metric_value: 863.00
   timestamp: Sat Jun  7 16:21:24 2025, metric_value: 868.00
   timestamp: Fri Jun  6 16:21:27 2025, metric_value: 873.00
   timestamp: Thu Jun  5 16:34:57 2025, metric_value: 899.00
   timestamp: Wed Jun  4 16:27:17 2025, metric_value: 878.00
   timestamp: Tue Jun  3 16:27:12 2025, metric_value: 905.00
   timestamp: Mon Jun  2 16:25:12 2025, metric_value: 905.00
   
   ```


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to