github-actions[bot] opened a new issue, #36764:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/36764

   
     Performance change found in the
     test: `gbk_python_batch_load_test_2gb_of_10B_records` for the metric: 
`runtime`.
   
     For more information on how to triage the alerts, please look at
     `Triage performance alert issues` section of the 
[README](https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/master/sdks/python/apache_beam/testing/analyzers/README.md#triage-performance-alert-issues).
   
   
   `Test description:` GroupByKey Python Load test - 2GB of 10B records
   python | GBK | Small records (10B)
   Test Dashboard - 
http://metrics.beam.apache.org/d/UYZ-oJ3Zk/gbk-load-tests?orgId=1&var-processingType=batch&var-sdk=python&from=now-90d&to=now&viewPanel=2
   Test link - 
https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/5e38decf9e723a385057131b01bbd33d8c60bda3/.test-infra/jenkins/job_LoadTests_GBK_Python.groovy#L36C25-L36C72
   
   
   ```
   
   timestamp: Sat Nov  8 16:22:19 2025, metric_value: 646.00
   timestamp: Fri Nov  7 16:18:36 2025, metric_value: 608.00
   timestamp: Thu Nov  6 16:24:43 2025, metric_value: 734.00 <---- Anomaly
   timestamp: Wed Nov  5 16:26:49 2025, metric_value: 920.00
   timestamp: Tue Nov  4 16:23:20 2025, metric_value: 730.00
   timestamp: Mon Nov  3 16:25:16 2025, metric_value: 966.00
   timestamp: Sun Nov  2 16:21:10 2025, metric_value: 829.00
   timestamp: Sat Nov  1 16:20:18 2025, metric_value: 819.00
   timestamp: Fri Oct 31 16:40:21 2025, metric_value: 748.00
   timestamp: Thu Oct 30 16:26:21 2025, metric_value: 833.00
   timestamp: Wed Oct 29 16:26:29 2025, metric_value: 837.00
   timestamp: Tue Oct 28 16:29:33 2025, metric_value: 963.00
   timestamp: Mon Oct 27 16:22:29 2025, metric_value: 849.00
   
   ```


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to