Amar3tto commented on code in PR #36954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/36954#discussion_r2582673275
##########
sdks/python/container/license_scripts/dep_urls_py.yaml:
##########
@@ -108,6 +108,32 @@ pip_dependencies:
license: "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/atdt/monotonic/master/LICENSE"
nose:
license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nose-devs/nose/master/lgpl.txt"
+ nvidia-cublas-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
+ nvidia-cuda-cupti-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
+ nvidia-cuda-nvrtc-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
+ nvidia-cuda-runtime-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
+ nvidia-cudnn-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
+ nvidia-cufft-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
+ nvidia-cufile-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
+ nvidia-curand-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
+ nvidia-cusolver-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
+ nvidia-cusparse-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
+ nvidia-nccl-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
+ nvidia-nvjitlink-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
+ nvidia-nvtx-cu12:
+ license:
"https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NVIDIA/cccl/refs/heads/main/LICENSE"
Review Comment:
I see, it's because the `release-2.69.0-postrelease` branch had nvidia
requirements in base_image_requirements.txt. And by default the workflow is
running against that branch.
I updated the PR, I think it should be enough to fix the workflow, please
review.
> Where are we using gpu_image_requirements.txt? Right now, we should just
be pushing the requirements file, not using it beyond that.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]