gemini-code-assist[bot] commented on PR #37565: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/37565#issuecomment-3883812889
## Summary of Changes Hello @Eliaaazzz, I'm Gemini Code Assist[^1]! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a significant optimization to the `BatchElements` transform by implementing length-aware keying. This enhancement allows elements of similar lengths to be batched together, drastically reducing padding waste, especially beneficial for workloads with variable-length inputs such as NLP inference. The changes involve a new DoFn for length-based routing, API updates to configure this behavior, and automatic integration into the stateful processing path, leading to improved resource utilization and overall efficiency. ### Highlights * **Length-Aware Keying Implementation**: Introduced a new `DoFn`, `WithLengthBucketKey`, which enables elements to be keyed based on their length, routing similarly sized elements to the same state partition for more efficient batching. * **API Enhancements**: The `BatchElements` transform and `ModelHandler.__init__` now accept `length_fn` and `bucket_boundaries` parameters, allowing users to configure length-aware batching. Default bucket boundaries are provided if `length_fn` is set without explicit boundaries. * **Automatic Stateful Path Integration**: Length-aware routing is automatically activated on the stateful path when both `max_batch_duration_secs` and `length_fn` are provided, ensuring optimized batching for streaming contexts. * **Improved Padding Efficiency**: New benchmark tests demonstrate a significant improvement in padding efficiency, increasing from approximately 68% to 77% for bimodal length distributions, by separating short and long elements into distinct batches. * **Robust Validation**: Added validation checks for `bucket_boundaries` to ensure they are non-empty, sorted, positive, and are only used when `length_fn` is also provided. 🧠**New Feature in Public Preview:** You can now enable **Memory** to help **Gemini Code Assist** learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. **Click [here](https://codeassist.google/code-review/login) to enable Memory in your admin console.** <details> <summary><b>Changelog</b></summary> * **sdks/python/apache_beam/ml/inference/base.py** * Added `length_fn` and `bucket_boundaries` parameters to the `ModelHandler.__init__` method. * Updated docstrings to describe the new `length_fn` and `bucket_boundaries` parameters. * Stored the new batching parameters in `_batching_kwargs` for configuration. * **sdks/python/apache_beam/ml/inference/base_test.py** * Added `test_length_fn_and_bucket_boundaries` to verify correct parameter passing. * Added `test_length_fn_only` to confirm `length_fn` is passed without `bucket_boundaries` when only `length_fn` is provided. * **sdks/python/apache_beam/transforms/util.py** * Imported the `bisect` module for efficient bucket lookup. * Implemented the `WithLengthBucketKey` DoFn for length-based element routing to specific state partitions. * Modified `BatchElements.__init__` to accept `length_fn` and `bucket_boundaries`. * Added validation logic for `bucket_boundaries` to ensure they are sorted, positive, and require `length_fn`. * Defined `_DEFAULT_BUCKET_BOUNDARIES` for length-aware batching when custom boundaries are not provided. * Updated `BatchElements.expand` to conditionally use `WithLengthBucketKey` for stateful, length-aware batching. * **sdks/python/apache_beam/transforms/util_test.py** * Imported `is_not_empty` for new test assertions. * Added `test_length_bucket_assignment` to verify the correct bucket indexing by `WithLengthBucketKey`. * Added `test_stateful_length_aware_constant_batch` to ensure elements in distinct length groups produce separate batches. * Added `test_stateful_length_aware_default_boundaries` to confirm the application of default bucket boundaries. * Added tests for `ValueError` conditions: `test_length_aware_requires_length_fn`, `test_bucket_boundaries_must_be_sorted`, and `test_bucket_boundaries_must_be_positive`. * Added `test_length_fn_without_stateful_is_ignored` to confirm that `length_fn` is ignored if stateful batching is not enabled. * Added `test_padding_efficiency_bimodal` benchmark to compare padding efficiency with and without length-aware bucketing. </details> <details> <summary><b>Activity</b></summary> * No human activity (comments, reviews, etc.) has been recorded on this pull request yet. </details> <details> <summary><b>Using Gemini Code Assist</b></summary> <br> The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our [documentation page](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/review-github-code), here are some quick tips. <b>Invoking Gemini</b> You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either `/gemini <command>` or `@gemini-code-assist <command>`. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page. Feature | Command | Description --- | --- | --- Code Review | `/gemini review` | Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. Pull Request Summary | `/gemini summary` | Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments. Help | `/gemini help` | Displays a list of available commands. <b>Customization</b> To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a `.gemini/` folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found [here](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/customize-gemini-behavior-github). <b>Limitations & Feedback</b> Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with :thumbsup: and :thumbsdown: on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up [here](https://google.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_2cyuGuTWsEw84yG). <b>You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the [Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension](https://cloud.google.com/products/gemini/code-assist).</b> </details> [^1]: Review the [Privacy Notices](https://policies.google.com/privacy), [Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy](https://policies.google.com/terms/generative-ai/use-policy), [Terms of Service](https://policies.google.com/terms), and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub [here](https://developers.google.com/gemini-code-assist/docs/customize-gemini-behavior-github). Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and [use code with caution](https://support.google.com/legal/answer/13505487). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
