lalitx17 commented on PR #38533: URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/38533#issuecomment-4622072618
> What are the next steps here ? Thanks! Thanks for the ping @chamikaramj! I’ll move this forward by avoiding the runner-dependent test. Given that `ExpectedLogs` only works reliably when SLF4J is bridged to JUL, and DirectRunner uses `slf4j-simple`, I don’t think changing the project-wide SLF4J binding or capturing stderr is worth the blast radius/flakiness. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
