gemini-code-assist[bot] commented on code in PR #38970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/38970#discussion_r3416284164


##########
sdks/java/core/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/sdk/transforms/AsyncWrapperTest.java:
##########
@@ -230,21 +230,20 @@ private void waitForEmpty(AsyncWrapper<?, ?, ?> 
asyncWrapper) {
   }
 
   private void waitForEmpty(AsyncWrapper<?, ?, ?> asyncWrapper, int 
timeoutSeconds) {
-    int count = 0;
+    long limit = System.currentTimeMillis() + timeoutSeconds * 1000L;
     while (!asyncWrapper.isEmpty()) {
+      if (System.currentTimeMillis() > limit) {
+        throw new RuntimeException("Timed out waiting for async dofn to be 
empty");
+      }

Review Comment:
   ![medium](https://www.gstatic.com/codereviewagent/medium-priority.svg)
   
   Using `System.currentTimeMillis()` to measure elapsed time or timeouts is 
unreliable because it is sensitive to system clock adjustments (e.g., NTP 
synchronization). It is recommended to use `System.nanoTime()` for monotonic 
time measurements.
   
   ```suggestion
       long limit = System.nanoTime() + timeoutSeconds * 1_000_000_000L;
       while (!asyncWrapper.isEmpty()) {
         if (System.nanoTime() > limit) {
           throw new RuntimeException("Timed out waiting for async dofn to be 
empty");
         }
   ```



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to