gemini-code-assist[bot] commented on code in PR #39272:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/39272#discussion_r3557594608


##########
runners/flink/src/test/java/org/apache/beam/runners/flink/translation/wrappers/streaming/io/UnboundedSourceWrapperTest.java:
##########
@@ -665,15 +665,16 @@ private static void testSourceDoesNotShutdown(boolean 
shouldHaveReaders) throws
         // Wait to see if the wrapper shuts down immediately in case it 
doesn't have readers
         if (!shouldHaveReaders) {
           // The expected state is for finalizeSource to sleep instead of 
exiting
-          while (true) {
-            StackTraceElement[] callStack = thread.getStackTrace();
-            if (callStack.length >= 2
-                && "sleep".equals(callStack[0].getMethodName())
-                && "finalizeSource".equals(callStack[1].getMethodName())) {
+          long deadlineMs = System.currentTimeMillis() + 9_000;
+          boolean reachedFinalizeSource = false;
+          while (System.currentTimeMillis() < deadlineMs) {

Review Comment:
   ![medium](https://www.gstatic.com/codereviewagent/medium-priority.svg)
   
   Using `System.currentTimeMillis()` to measure elapsed time or timeouts is an 
anti-pattern because it is sensitive to system clock adjustments (such as NTP 
synchronization or manual clock changes). It is highly recommended to use 
`System.nanoTime()` for monotonic time measurements instead.
   
   ```suggestion
             long deadlineNs = System.nanoTime() + 9_000_000_000L;
             boolean reachedFinalizeSource = false;
             while (System.nanoTime() < deadlineNs) {
   ```



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to