github-actions[bot] opened a new issue, #39911:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/39911

   
     Performance change found in the
     test: `cogbk_python_batch_load_test_reiterate_4times_2MB_values` for the 
metric: `runtime`.
   
     For more information on how to triage the alerts, please look at
     `Triage performance alert issues` section of the 
[README](https://github.com/apache/beam/tree/master/sdks/python/apache_beam/testing/analyzers/README.md#triage-performance-alert-issues).
   
   
   `Test description:` CoGroupByKey Python Load test - reiterate 4 times 2 MB 
values
   python | coGBK | reiteration 2MB value
   Test Link - 
https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/5e38decf9e723a385057131b01bbd33d8c60bda3/.test-infra/jenkins/job_LoadTests_coGBK_Python.groovy#L128
   Test Dashboard - 
http://metrics.beam.apache.org/d/fK0U4JqWz/cogbk-load-tests?orgId=1&var-processingType=batch&var-sdk=python&viewPanel=5
   
   
   ```
   
   timestamp: Thu Aug 27 19:51:22 2026, metric_value: 573.00
   timestamp: Wed Aug 26 16:49:47 2026, metric_value: 135.00
   timestamp: Tue Aug 25 16:24:00 2026, metric_value: 440.00 <---- Anomaly
   timestamp: Mon Aug 24 16:17:04 2026, metric_value: 86.00
   timestamp: Sun Aug 23 16:21:14 2026, metric_value: 93.00
   timestamp: Sat Aug 22 16:26:16 2026, metric_value: 89.00
   timestamp: Fri Aug 21 16:17:33 2026, metric_value: 74.00
   timestamp: Thu Aug 20 16:21:13 2026, metric_value: 120.00
   timestamp: Wed Aug 19 16:09:36 2026, metric_value: 114.00
   timestamp: Tue Aug 18 16:29:37 2026, metric_value: 195.00
   timestamp: Sun Aug 16 16:27:25 2026, metric_value: 152.00
   timestamp: Sat Aug 15 16:29:41 2026, metric_value: 105.00
   timestamp: Fri Aug 14 16:26:59 2026, metric_value: 83.00
   
   ```


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to