kennknowles opened a new pull request, #40020:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/40020

   BatchDataflowWorker shut down WorkProgressUpdater in the finally block of 
executeWork() before calling workItemStatusClient.reportSuccess(). If the 
worker thread was delayed in closing connections, flushing shuffle state, or 
serializing counters and metrics, no lease renewals could be sent, allowing the 
180s work item lease to expire on the Dataflow service.
   
   Furthermore, reportSuccess() and reportUpdate() in WorkItemStatusClient both 
synchronized on the same monitor lock, blocking any concurrent lease renewals 
while the worker thread was assembling final metrics.
   
   To fix this:
   1. Extend progress reporting in BatchDataflowWorker so progressUpdater stays 
active until reportSuccess() completes, while reporting any unreported dynamic 
split before success.
   2. Decouple monitor locking in WorkItemStatusClient so counter and metric 
extraction run outside the RPC lock, using a dedicated metricsLock to serialize 
metric extraction and commits.
   3. Support lightweight lease renewal pings without heavyweight metric 
serialization to keep leases alive under high CPU/memory utilization.
   4. Gracefully handle in-flight non-final status updates in execute() if a 
final completion state was already sent.
   
   ------------------------
   
   Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us 
incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
   
    - [x] Mention the appropriate issue in your description (for example: 
`addresses #123`), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the 
pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close 
on merging the pull request, comment `fixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>` instead.
    - [x] Update `CHANGES.md` with noteworthy changes.
    - [x] If this contribution is large, please file an Apache [Individual 
Contributor License Agreement](https://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.pdf).
   
   See the [Contributor Guide](https://beam.apache.org/contribute) for more 
tips on [how to make review process 
smoother](https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#make-the-reviewers-job-easier).
   
   To check the build health, please visit 
[https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md](https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md)
   
   GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
   
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   [![Build python source distribution and 
wheels](https://github.com/apache/beam/actions/workflows/build_wheels.yml/badge.svg?event=schedule&&?branch=master)](https://github.com/apache/beam/actions?query=workflow%3A%22Build+python+source+distribution+and+wheels%22+branch%3Amaster+event%3Aschedule)
   [![Python 
tests](https://github.com/apache/beam/actions/workflows/python_tests.yml/badge.svg?event=schedule&&?branch=master)](https://github.com/apache/beam/actions?query=workflow%3A%22Python+Tests%22+branch%3Amaster+event%3Aschedule)
   [![Java 
tests](https://github.com/apache/beam/actions/workflows/java_tests.yml/badge.svg?event=schedule&&?branch=master)](https://github.com/apache/beam/actions?query=workflow%3A%22Java+Tests%22+branch%3Amaster+event%3Aschedule)
   [![Go 
tests](https://github.com/apache/beam/actions/workflows/go_tests.yml/badge.svg?event=schedule&&?branch=master)](https://github.com/apache/beam/actions?query=workflow%3A%22Go+tests%22+branch%3Amaster+event%3Aschedule)
   
   See [CI.md](https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/CI.md) for more 
information about GitHub Actions CI or the [workflows 
README](https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.github/workflows/README.md) 
to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to