satybald commented on pull request #15185:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/pull/15185#issuecomment-893919805


   > Excellent, I'm glad that `fastavro` has had the desired impact on 
steady-state throughput. I believe you are correct that the combination of no 
dynamic work rebalancing and transient work item failures is leading to the 
increase in overall runtime. We'll look into the latter first.
   
   Awesome! Thank you so much for help! I've mailed @vachan-shetty the BQ 
storage API session ID that processed the failed work item. I hope it helps 
with troubleshooting


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to