kennknowles opened a new issue, #19507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/beam/issues/19507

   Classes affected:
    org.apache.beam.sdk.options.ValueProvider.Serializer
    org.apache.beam.sdk.options.ValueProvider.Deserializer
   
   The problem is that according to the JsonDeserializer documentation, the 
deserialize method isn't executed for null nodes:
    ( 
[https://static.javadoc.io/com.fasterxml.jackson.core/jackson-databind/2.9.6/com/fasterxml/jackson/databind/JsonDeserializer.html#deserialize(com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParser,%20com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationContext)](https://static.javadoc.io/com.fasterxml.jackson.core/jackson-databind/2.9.6/com/fasterxml/jackson/databind/JsonDeserializer.html#deserialize(com.fasterxml.jackson.core.JsonParser,%20com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.DeserializationContext)
 )
    )
    "Note that this method is never called for JSON null literal, and thus 
deserializers need (and should) not check for it."
   
   If we serialize a RuntimeValueProvider, the isAccessible() will return 
false, so we call a writeNull(). During deserialization this isn't handled 
properly as mentioned and our deserialization will return null.
   
   The end result is that getters with ValueProvider return values will return 
"null". AFAIK ValueProvider getters should be never null.
   
   My guess is that either we should completely omit serializing 
RuntimeValueProviders, or during deserialization the proper runtime value 
provider should be created again - which requires more than just a simple 
"null" being present in the json.
   
   Imported from Jira 
[BEAM-6963](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-6963). Original Jira may 
contain additional context.
   Reported by: bnemeth.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to