alamb opened a new issue, #10699: URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10699
Follow on to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10579 My (personal) North ⭐ : 1000 projects are built using DataFusion 📈 **It would be great for other contributors to DataFusion who plan non trivial work could try to make them visible somehow as well** 🙏 (feel free to copy / modify the format) ## My Highlights from Last Week * Extracting Aggregate functions: @jayzhan211 and @mustafasrepo are crushing it: extracting aggregate functions https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10644 https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10648 * `TreeNode` reference visitor https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10543 from @peter-toth @ozankabak and @berkaysynnada * `ParquetExec` is getting better thanks to @NGA-TRAN @xinlifoobar and @Lordworms (https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10610, https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10593, https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10642, https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10592 etc) * `unnest` works with `Struct` now! https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10429 -- thanks @duongcongtoai * @Blizzara and @waynexia and @jonahgao are improving Substrait support e.g https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10531 * @HawaiianSpork made `SchemaAdapter` public: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10680 * @goldmedal made the unparser nicer: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10573 * @lewiszlw made several nice API improvements like https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10575 and https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/10576 ## My (personal) plans for this week TLDR is I plan to keep trying to make parquet support better (documentation and examples) - [ ] Keep hacking on https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10453 - [ ] Complete https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10546 - [ ] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/9929 - [ ] https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10480 - [ ] https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/10403 - [ ] Help @tustvold complete https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5736 (byreviewing) ## Project Queue (list of future projects) - [ ] (Stretch) https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/9873 copies (last part of https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/9637) - [ ] In general, help https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs/issues/5374 more actively as it seems to be stuck ## Projects I plan to help actively help review / plan - [ ] https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/9494 # Algorithm for (my) prioritizing PR reviews Note there are many [committers](https://projects.apache.org/committee.html?datafusion) who can and do review and merge PRs, so this is not the priorities of the project as a whole, just the approximate algorithm I use to prioritize my own time. Priority: 1. Bug fixes (where something is just incorrect), especially regressions (where it used to work and now does not) 2. Improvements directly related to features needed for InfluxDB (my employer) 3. Documentation and test improvements (I view these as very strategically important) 4. PRs that I think are strategically important 5. Other new features / additions to functionality (note this is the lowest) The top strategically important projects in my head are: * Anything that makes it easier to use DataFusion as a user (docs, examples, better APIs, etc), including [Getting started guide for new users (who want to use DataFusion in their project) ](https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/7014) * Anything that improves DataFusion's quality such as bug fixes, and improved / expanded tests, etc * Making function packages modular and easier to mix/match * Improved performance (with benchmarks) Thus, if you are interested in contributing to DataFusion and are interested in a fast turn around time I would recommend looking into bug fixes / test improvements / documentation or the projects named above. If you propose adding new functionality, especially if the PR is large/complex and not connected to a wider need, the review cycle will likely be longer. You can make it a shorter cycle by looking at the comments on other recent PRs and following the same model (e.g. ensure there are tests in sqllogictest for example, the CI passes, includes documentation, etc) ## Background The idea of this ticket is make my plans for DataFusion visible, largely for my own personal organizational needs, but also to: 1. Communicate / coordinate in the community 2. Help provide an interesting summary of what is happening in DataFusion this week -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusion.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: github-h...@datafusion.apache.org
